FREE, NO OBLIGATION
The Free AI Visibility Audit shows you exactly where your brand stands across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. You will see your AI Share of Voice versus named competitors, the exact buyer prompts where competitors are cited instead of you, a technical AEO check of your site's citation readiness, and the single highest-impact action to start winning citations. Free, delivered in 30 minutes, zero obligation.
Results delivered within 5 business days. 30-minute call. No pitch deck.
WHAT YOU GET
This is not a generic checklist or an automated score. Every audit is run manually by LLMReach's team across your actual buyer prompts on all four major AI platforms. Here is exactly what you receive:
Deliverable 1
Your brand's citation rate versus named competitors across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. Expressed as a percentage: how often your brand appears in AI answers about your category compared to how often competitors appear. This is the number that tells you whether you have an AI visibility problem - and how big it is.
Deliverable 2
The exact buyer prompts where competitors are cited instead of you. Not a general observation that "competitors perform better" - a specific list of the highest-intent queries in your category where your brand is absent and a named competitor is cited in your place. This is the data that tells you exactly where to focus.
Deliverable 3
Which competitors AI engines name most frequently in your category, from which specific URLs, and at what position in the answer. You will know which competitor pages are outperforming yours, what content structure they use, and why AI engines prefer them for specific prompts.
Deliverable 4
A review of the four technical signals most likely to be blocking your AI citations right now:
Deliverable 5
One specific, actionable recommendation - not a list of twenty things to fix. The single change most likely to move your citation rate in the next 30 days, based on your specific audit findings. This is the recommendation you can act on immediately, with or without engaging LLMReach further.
Deliverable 6
A clear view of the full opportunity: what your AI visibility could look like in 90 days with a structured GEO program, which service would have the highest impact for your specific situation, and what a realistic improvement timeline looks like based on your current baseline.
HOW IT WORKS
Step 1
Pick a time that works for you. The booking takes 60 seconds. You provide your website URL and the names of two or three competitors. That is everything we need.
Step 2
Before your call, LLMReach's team runs your priority buyer prompts across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. We record every citation, every competitor mention, every cited URL, and every technical signal. The audit takes approximately 2 to 3 hours of our time and zero hours of yours.
Step 3
In your 30-minute call, we walk through the data: your AI Share of Voice, the prompts where competitors are winning, the technical barriers we found, and the single highest-impact recommendation for your situation. You ask questions. We answer them directly.
Step 4
You leave the call knowing exactly where your brand stands in AI search, which competitors are outperforming you and why, and the single most impactful action to take next. Whether you work with LLMReach or not, the data is yours.
WHO IT'S FOR
B2B SaaS founders and marketing leaders
Your buyers research software in ChatGPT before booking demos. The audit shows you exactly which "best [category]" and "[competitor] alternatives" prompts are driving citations - and whether your brand is in those answers or a competitor is. If you are not being cited, the audit tells you exactly why and what to fix first.
E-commerce and DTC brand owners
AI-driven product discovery is the fastest-growing acquisition channel in 2025 and 2026. The audit shows you which product and category prompts are driving AI citations in your space, which competitor products are being recommended instead of yours, and what technical and content changes would make your products the AI recommendation.
Agency owners and professional services leaders
When a prospect asks Claude or Perplexity for the best agency in your specialty, the firm that gets cited gets the call. The audit shows you whether your firm is being named, which competitors are being recommended instead, and what the gap between your current citation rate and a market-leading position looks like.
Demand gen and growth marketing teams
You are already seeing AI referral traffic in GA4 and want to understand where it is coming from and how to grow it. The audit gives you a citation baseline across all four platforms, a competitive positioning snapshot, and a clear view of the highest-impact GEO investments for your pipeline goals.
Brands that have invested in SEO but not GEO
You have domain authority, strong content, and solid Google rankings - but you suspect your AI citation rate does not reflect your market position. The audit will almost certainly confirm that suspicion and show you exactly which technical and content gaps are suppressing your citations despite your strong SEO foundation.
WHAT YOU'LL SEE
Most brands have never seen their AI visibility data. Here is exactly what the audit produces - the same data LLMReach tracks weekly for ongoing clients, delivered as a one-time snapshot for audit participants.
A platform-by-platform breakdown of your brand's citation rate versus named competitors. For each platform - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - you see how often your brand is cited versus how often each competitor is cited across the same prompt set. Most brands discover a significant gap between their Google market share and their AI Share of Voice.
A table of your highest-intent buyer prompts with citation results for each platform. For every prompt, you see which brand is cited, at what position, and from which URL. The prompts where competitors are cited instead of you are highlighted as priority targets.
A pass/fail check of the four technical signals most likely to be suppressing your citations: llms.txt, schema markup, robots.txt AI crawler configuration, and entity signal consistency. Each item is marked as present and correct, present but incomplete, or missing entirely - with a one-line explanation of the citation impact.
One specific action - not a list. The change most likely to move your citation rate in the next 30 days, based on your specific audit findings. Explained in plain language with enough detail to act on immediately.
A clear view of what your AI visibility could look like in 90 days with a structured GEO program: which prompts you could realistically win, what AI Share of Voice improvement is achievable based on your current baseline, and which service - AI Visibility Strategy, Technical AEO Infrastructure, or AI Mention Tracking - would have the highest impact for your specific situation.
REAL RESULTS
The most common reaction at the end of an AI Visibility Audit is surprise. Not because the findings are complicated, but because the gap between where a brand assumes it stands in AI search and where it actually stands is almost always larger than expected. Here is what audit clients consistently find:
The prompts with the highest purchase intent - "best [category] for [use case]," "[competitor] alternatives," "top [category] vendors" - are almost always the prompts with the lowest citation rates. These are the queries where buyers are making decisions, and most brands are completely absent from the AI answer.
In most categories, AI citations are not evenly distributed. One or two competitors have significantly higher citation rates than the rest of the field - often because they were early to publish answer-first content or have stronger entity signals, not because they have better products. The audit identifies exactly who those competitors are and which specific pages are driving their citations.
The vast majority of sites audited have at least one significant technical barrier suppressing AI citations: a missing llms.txt, AI crawlers blocked in robots.txt, JavaScript-rendered key pages that AI crawlers cannot read, or inconsistent entity signals across directories. These are fixable in days or weeks - and fixing them often produces immediate citation movement.
Almost every brand audited has AI-referred traffic in GA4 - but it is misattributed to direct or referral channels because the GA4 AI channel group has not been configured. The audit reveals the true scale of AI-driven traffic that is already arriving and being lost in attribution.
The case study
0 → 52%AI Share of Voice in 90 days
One LLMReach client, an AI consulting company, started with a 0% citation rate across all tested prompts on all major AI platforms. Within 90 days of implementing Technical AEO Infrastructure and AI Visibility Strategy, their AI Share of Voice reached 52%, meaning they appeared in more than half of all AI responses about their category. The audit was the starting point.
See the full case study: 0% to 52%COMMON QUESTIONS
Yes - and it is growing faster than any other acquisition channel for most B2B and e-commerce brands. AI referral traffic in GA4 is already measurable for the majority of brands we audit. More importantly, the buyers arriving from AI citations are typically the highest-intent visitors in your funnel - they asked a specific research question, got a specific answer naming your brand, and then clicked through. That is a very different visitor from someone who clicked a Google ad.
Ranking on Google and being cited in AI answers are different outcomes driven by different signals. A brand can rank number one on Google for a keyword and have a zero percent citation rate on that same query in ChatGPT. The optimization targets - keyword density and backlinks for Google, extractability and entity clarity for AI - are fundamentally different. Strong Google rankings are a useful starting point for AI citations, but they do not guarantee them.
The audit costs nothing and takes 30 minutes of your time. If the data shows your AI citation rate is already strong and competitors are not outperforming you significantly, you will know that GEO is not a priority right now. If it shows a significant gap, you will have the data to make an informed decision about whether to address it. Either way, the audit gives you information you do not currently have - at zero cost.
Every audit is run manually by LLMReach's team using the same prompt testing methodology we use for ongoing client tracking. We test each prompt multiple times per platform to account for response variability and document every citation with a screenshot. You see the raw data, not a processed score. If you want to verify any finding independently, you can test the same prompts yourself in any of the four platforms we cover.
GEO results depend entirely on the methodology. The most common failure mode is treating AI visibility as an extension of traditional SEO - optimizing for keywords and backlinks rather than extractability and entity clarity. The audit will show you exactly which signals are suppressing your citations and whether the previous approach addressed them. If it did not, you will know specifically what was missing.
FAQ
Yes. The AI Visibility Audit is completely free and carries no obligation. LLMReach runs it because it is the most honest way to show you exactly where your brand stands in AI search and whether GEO is worth pursuing for your specific business. You will leave the call with real data about your AI visibility regardless of whether you decide to work with us.
The free AI Visibility Audit includes your AI Share of Voice across the four major AI platforms; the exact buyer prompts where competitors are cited instead of you; which competitors AI engines name most frequently and from which URLs; a technical AEO check covering llms.txt, schema markup, robots.txt configuration, and entity signals; your single highest-impact opportunity to start winning citations; and a prioritized next step with zero obligation.
Just your website URL and the names of two or three competitors. LLMReach handles all the prompt testing across all four platforms and brings the complete findings to the call. The audit takes approximately 2 to 3 hours of LLMReach's time and zero hours of yours before the call.
The strategy call is 30 minutes. We share the audit findings live, explain what is driving or blocking your citations, show you exactly where competitors are outperforming you, and outline the single highest-impact next step for your specific situation. If you have questions, we answer them directly on the call.
Audit results are delivered within 5 business days of booking. You pick a 30-minute slot, LLMReach runs the full audit before the call, and you receive all findings live during the session. A summary document is sent after the call.
The audit covers ChatGPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), Perplexity AI, and Google Gemini - the four major AI platforms that account for the vast majority of AI-driven buyer research queries. Each platform is tested independently because citation behavior differs significantly across them.
You leave with a clear picture of your current AI visibility, a competitive baseline versus named competitors, and a prioritized recommendation for the highest-impact improvement. If it makes sense to work together on AI Visibility Strategy, Technical AEO Infrastructure, or AI Mention Tracking, we will explain how. If it does not make sense for your situation, we will tell you that too. There is no sales pressure and no obligation.
The audit is for founders, marketing leaders, and demand gen teams who know their buyers are using AI to research vendors and want to know whether their brand shows up in those answers. It is particularly valuable for B2B SaaS companies, e-commerce and DTC brands, agencies, and professional services firms where AI-driven buyer research is already influencing pipeline.
Every finding in the audit is based on live prompt testing that you can replicate yourself. We document each citation with the exact prompt used, the platform tested, and the response received. If you want to verify any finding, you can test the same prompt in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or any other platform we cover and see the same result.
Yes. A summary document of the audit findings is sent after the call, formatted for sharing with leadership, board members, or marketing teams who were not on the call. The document includes your AI Share of Voice baseline, the competitive citation map, the technical AEO scorecard, and the prioritized recommendations.
GET STARTED
Pick a slot, provide your website URL and two or three competitor names, and LLMReach will do the rest. You will have real data about your AI visibility within 5 business days.
30 minutes. No pitch deck. No obligation. Results within 5 business days.
Prefer to reach us directly before booking?
Not ready to book yet? See a real result first.
0% to 52% AI Share of Voice in 90 daysLEARN MORE
AI Visibility Strategy & Content Engineering
The service that addresses content and prompt gaps found in the audit
Technical AEO Infrastructure
The service that fixes the technical barriers the audit identifies
AI Mention Tracking & Optimization
The ongoing tracking service that measures and compounds your citation gains after the audit
How AI engines decide what to cite
The technical logic behind why some brands get cited and others do not
Case study: 0% to 52% AI Share of Voice
A real example of what happens after an audit leads to a full GEO engagement
AI search statistics 2026
The data behind AI-driven buyer behavior and why AI visibility matters now